Health Clinics: Risk or Health Revolution

by Shain Waugh

General Consumer

The cost of health care in the United States of America is continue to rise. With the integration of health retail clinics into the health care community, has saved the general consumer millions of dollar by simply staying out of the emergency room. Most clinics accept insurance, walk-ins, and for simple procedures patients are usually seen within 15 minutes.

The general consumer’s view of healthcare is changing on a globalized scale. The consumer is expecting more information access, embracing globalize medical tourism, better access to medical facilities, and improved customer service. The health care industry has responed strongly to the demands and desired trends of the community by integrating retail health centers in shopping malls, grocery stores, and pharmacies. The availability of such clinics have created a new business market for the general consumer, in turn, empowering the general public decision on healthcare.

Changing the System

In the changing of the systems, the clinic are orchastrated by nurse practitioners, which are nurses with advanced degrees who can write prescriptions. The salary of a nurse practitioners is usually half the cost of an internal medicine physician. The clinics are typically open 7 days a week and patient, 15 minute visit, and prescriptions can be obtained prior to leaving the facility.

Embracing Change

The American Medical Association, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Academy of Pediatrics, which opposes retail clinics as a source of medical care for children of all ages, have issued similar guidelines related to retail clinics. All three organizations are particularly concerned about increased fragmentation of care.

The three association recommends that its 100,000 plus physician to expand office offer, embrace same-day appointment, and take part in the general community in order to compete with the retail clinics. The health systems currently face a few options in embracing retail clinics. The options entail either medical facilities choose not to become competitive or find methods to integrate into the retail clinic arena.

Summing Up

As retail health centers continue to evolve, and as more organizations test the market, multiple clinical and business models will provide health care organizations the opportunity to evaluate alternatives. Rather than viewing retail clinics as a threat, hospital and other medical facilities leaders should view the clinics as revolution for health care.

Add to Technorati FavoritesAdd to Google Reader or Homepage Blog Flux Directory

One Response to “Health Clinics: Risk or Health Revolution”

  1. Larry Stiffman, Ph.D., MPH Says:

    The retail/in-store clinic movement is more than a highly beneficial strain of “disruption” to the primary healthcare delivery system. Looking forward, it should also be a significant catalyst and test-bed to improve community health status.

    This strategy entails e-collaboration with a robust referral care network harmonizing enabling tools related to consumer-directed wellness, early disease detection and disease management services. Add a hefty dash of one-on-one customer rewarding based on health risk appraisal completion. Follow up with sequential adherence-based economic incentives fulfilled through behavioral target marketing with customized couponing triggered by the HRA findings, seasonal drivers, and respondent demographics. Similar reward triggering could be based on benchmark attainment within disease management protocols.
    Win-wins arise building loyal families in touch with new teams of wellness providers. It’s opt-in and HIPAA immune, and is freed from the babble generated by a zillion committees, taskforces, and “working” groups intent on cyber transacting everything. To the extent progressive local and regional health systems are included, the smoother the political sailing. For example, a Blue Cross plan could co-venture production of selected services. Local VNA and health departments would continue to make excellent staffing partners for short-lived campaigns such as back-to-school vaccinations. With insurance coverage arising and rising, the customer is the beneficiary regardless of the chosen production function.

    Service demand can be continuously driven by demographic (gender and age) thresholds per U.S Public Health Service guidelines. Such info is captured within the HRA completion process to trigger sentinel announcements (for example, 50th birthday) and invites along with customized coupons to promote visiting the clinic and the store. Intervention opportunities also arise seasonally. Examples include the promotion of back-to-school and vacation-prompting vaccinations, flu season shots with pneumonia piggy-backed on, spring and fall seasonal allergies, and national body part (i.e., Breast Cancer) of the month campaigns.
    Why Retail Clinics as the Locus for Change?

    Incumbents in the retail clinic space grow because their business case is compelling, enterprises are sufficiently capitalized and customer experiences are highly scored by all relevant satisfaction metrics. These operations are still in early growth facing normal start-up woes:

    1. Uncertain ROIs and break-even points, staffing, information capture and work-flow patterns
    2. “Without the doc” risk-averse service menus, voluntary script dispensing/selling firewalls, constrained spatial layouts and low-ball pricing.

    Thus, there is plenty of wiggle room to now plan additional functionality as the kinks get worked out and consumer acceptance grows. As competition increases, investment drivers include the need for continuous product improvement and differentiation as well as for satisfying large customer cohorts shifting from latent to expressed demand for diagnostic, immunization and screening services. In-store worker-focused risk assessments add icing to the convenience cake, especially by filling in off-peak appointment slots, smoothing work flow and reducing queues and wait times. (Workers’ rewards must be nondiscriminatory per U.S. Department of Labor regs compared with customers’ rewards.)

    Like Lipitor, the “daughter products” released after its ingestion are more beneficial than the original dose. Sensible protocol-based and decision-supported adult primary care is the core retail clinic output platform now in place. Providing appropriate consumer-assisting programs with health systems co-venturers builds upon sunk investments at low marginal cost.

    In many urban and rural communities, the default locus for free “medical advice” has traditionally been the neighborhood pharmacist. The retail clinic can expand this tradition with one-on-one assistive and practical care in terms of fuller primary prevention services that are disease- or body-part specific.
    Many screening and testing services have been battle-tested in drug stores, at health fairs and convention lobbies and within assorted clinics of all stripes. More recently, based on strong empirical evidence from workplace wellness settings, providing customized incentives and rewards is essential to “get people to the last mile” to initiate behavioral change. This might become an especially compelling strategy with the deployment of emerging home-based disease management products incorporating remote monitoring. Incentives could take many forms from reward programs to price discounts on in-store goods and services.

    Convenient Primary Prevention Would Gain Equal Footing with Convenient Care

    Given pervasive techno-chaos within the overall healthcare industry, it takes business discipline and standardization to harmonize appropriate processes and technology. Just consider the hundreds of options flowing from web-based and traditional programming in risk assessment and personal auditing and tracking programming including health risk appraisals, HSAs and derivative financial products, mini personal health records, electronic medical records, chronic disease management with remote monitoring, behavioral targeting and one-on-one relationship marketing and loyalty card systems.

    Each of these now operate under different parentage – from health departments, governments, self-insured large employers, progressive unions, managed care organizations, classic insurers, marketing services firms and, increasingly, by customers themselves. Many have or will become zero-priced commodities. The good news is that all are adjunctive to enhancing the retail clinics’ care and caring missions.

    The retail clinic could assume employers’ traditional role in health risk appraisal to get incentive packages, monitoring and benchmarking locked and loaded. Then, many follow-through tests and procedures are done in store with out-referral when appropriate. Record keeping would be online and really simple. It’s like installing training wheels for the emerging PHR and EMR systems. These convergent systems are typified by early developer groups such as WebMD while
    Google is constructing a PHR system.

    Caring Processes are Inseparable from Care Processes

    Retail Clinic 2.0 positioning is not glitzy PR to deflect the opening blows by organized physician groups that wrongly perceive negative competition from nurse practitioners and others. The reality is all PCPs (and, more importantly, their patients) will be universally better off if they begin to mimic some of the critical convenience, staffing, IT and pricing success factors put in place by the retailers.

    The docs are far from being disintermediated; they can be emancipated from the routine sniffles and scratches while remaining wired in, utilizing their time and skills more appropriately and productively. Ditto for our under-funded public health clinics that will face huge work flow and staffing problems as prevention and wellness eventually obtain public and private core financing. Latent demand for the 55-year-olds and kids is likely to explode if Medicare expands down and SCHIP widens.

    Recent AMA opening moves challenging the emerging retail clinic industry’s usurpation of physician roles and functions were inevitable. It’s fuming again but will lose the battle because:

    1. Their economic self-interest becomes more visible than their patients’,
    2. The inherent cost-effectiveness of the current approaches is readily apparent to customers (especially where services are insured), and
    3. Business groups, governments, employers, public health associations and insurers all welcome price and quality competition wherever and whenever they find it.

Leave a Reply